Shane Gillis Was Fired From ‘SNL’ During Monologue, Reflecting on His Controversial Journey


Over the years, the world of comedy has seen its fair share of controversies. One such incident involved comedian Shane Gillis and his short-lived stint on “Saturday Night Live” (SNL). Gillis made headlines when he was fired from the show just days before his first episode aired due to the resurfacing of racist and homophobic slurs from his podcast. In a surprising turn of events, Gillis recently returned to host SNL and addressed his firing during his monologue, admitting that he probably shouldn’t be up there. Let’s take a closer look at Gillis’ journey, the events that led to his firing, and his recent monologue.

The Rise and Fall of Shane Gillis

Shane Gillis burst onto the comedy scene with his unique brand of humor that often pushed boundaries. With a growing fanbase, he seemed poised for success when he was announced as a cast member for SNL in September 2019. Alongside Chloe Fineman and Bowen Yang, Gillis was set to make his mark on the iconic sketch comedy show.

However, just four days after the announcement, Gillis found himself at the center of controversy. Recordings from his podcast surfaced, revealing the use of racist and homophobic slurs. SNL swiftly made the decision to fire Gillis, citing their lack of prior knowledge of his offensive remarks and acknowledging that their vetting process fell short.

Gillis responded to his firing with a statement that did not include an apology for his language. Instead, he took a swipe at SNL, expressing his preference for the rival sketch comedy show, Mad TV. Many fans were left wondering if Gillis would ever have a chance to redeem himself.

Gillis’ Surprising Return to SNL

In a shocking turn of events, Gillis was invited back to host SNL, despite the controversy surrounding his previous firing. During his monologue, Gillis addressed his past actions head-on, admitting that he probably shouldn’t be up there. He humorously suggested that he should have pursued a career as a high school football coach instead.

Gillis went on to perform a stand-up routine that touched on various topics, including his father’s role as a girls’ high school basketball coach and his observations about family dynamics. While his material was edgy and pushed the boundaries of what could be considered appropriate for television, Gillis acknowledged the nerves he felt and the challenges of performing in such a well-lit environment.

The Fallout and Redemption

Gillis’ controversial journey raises important questions about accountability and redemption in the world of comedy. The decision to invite him back to host SNL sparked debates among fans and industry professionals alike. Some praised SNL for giving Gillis a second chance, arguing that comedians should have the freedom to push boundaries without fear of cancellation. Others criticized the show for seemingly downplaying the seriousness of his past remarks.

Regardless of where one stands on the issue, it is evident that Gillis’ journey is not unique in the comedy world. Comedians often walk a fine line between pushing boundaries and crossing them, and the consequences of their actions can be severe. The incident serves as a reminder that words have power and that comedians, like anyone else, are accountable for their language.


Shane Gillis’ journey from being fired from SNL to returning as a host is a testament to the complexities of the comedy industry. His monologue, where he admitted that he probably shouldn’t be up there, showcased his willingness to address the controversy surrounding him. Whether Gillis’ redemption will be fully realized remains to be seen, but his story serves as a reminder of the importance of accountability and growth in the world of comedy.

As the comedy landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial to navigate the fine line between pushing boundaries and respecting the impact of our words. Comedians have a unique role in society, often challenging norms and provoking thought. However, it is essential for them to do so responsibly, taking into account the potential consequences of their language. Only by doing so can they continue to entertain and provoke meaningful conversations without causing harm.